Tag Archives: Jupiter

Cannot deserialize XBF metadata type list as NullableBoolToBoolConverter was not found in namespace

I was trying to get something working last night and kept hitting this exception when my app was trying to InitializeComponent() at one point.


First-chance exception at 0x750D1D4D in App1.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: Platform::COMException ^ at memory location 0x037CDDC0. HRESULT:0x802B000A The text associated with this error code could not be found.

WinRT information: Windows.UI.Xaml.Markup.XamlParseException: The text associated with this error code could not be found.

Cannot deserialize XBF metadata type list as ‘NullableBoolToBoolConverter’ was not found in namespace ‘WinRTXamlToolkit.Converters’. [Line: 0 Position: 0]

at Windows.UI.Xaml.Application.LoadComponent(Object component, Uri resourceLocator, ComponentResourceLocation componentResourceLocation)

All this seemed complete and utter bogus, since NullableBoolToBoolConverter was obviously there and it would work perfectly well in other projects or solution configurations, so let’s look what was happening.

  • NullableBoolToBoolConverter is defined in WinRTXamlToolkit – a .NET Class Library that I’d typically build as Any CPU. It has a ton of controls, converters and other such goodies and of course it typically works just fine.
  • NullableBoolToBoolConverter is used in WinRTXamlToolkit.Debugging – another .NET Class Library that has an in-app XAML visual tree debugger tool – essentially a TreeView control that displays information about the visual tree of your application – hierarchy of UI elements and their properties. The main control in the library uses NullableBoolToBoolConverter and it normally works when used from a .NET Windows Store app.
  • The problem is that WinRTXamlToolkit.Debugging is a .NET Class Library and there is still a small, but important range of WinRT XAML apps written in C++ that can’t use it, so I created a managed WinRT component library – WinRTXamlToolkit.Debugging.WinRTProxy that C++/CX projects can reference. It’s fairly straightforward to do it seems – you just create a proxy class in the WinRT Component library that has methods that invoke methods in the referenced class library (WinRTXamlToolkit.Debugging) and now you can use it from C++/CX. I prefer to keep WinRTXamlToolkit.Debugging a regular .NET class library because WinRT Components have limitations that would limit the APIs I currently have in WinRTXamlToolkit.Debugging. The proxy methods in the WinRTProxy library still have these limitations, but at least I can use it from a native app. The problem is that it wouldn’t work and keep giving me that exception, so what’s up?

It turns out WinRT XAML generates these files – XamlTypeInfo.g.cs that allow the XAML parser to see the types it can use and I noticed that file was missing in the obj folder of WinRTXamlToolkit.Debugging.WinRTProxy. To get it to generate I simply added one empty UserControl to WinRTXamlToolkit.Debugging.WinRTProxy and everything started working fine! Weird but it works. So now I’m left with figuring out how to wrap this all as a NuGet component with native versions of the .NET libraries, since I’ve previously only packaged Any CPU binaries…

Tagged , , , , , ,

WPF/Silverlight vs. Jupiter Quirks – Opacity

Have you noticed the difference in how the Opacity property is handled by child elements the Windows 8 XAML vs. Silverlight or WPF?


Windows 8 XAML (Jupiter):

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , ,

In Search of a Better Name Than Windows Runtime “XAML” Framework

XAML is a very non-descriptive name for one of the UI technologies used in Windows 8 Metro style apps. Nothing at the level of WPF/Avalon or Silverlight/WPF/E. “Jupiter” could be its name, but no one at Microsoft ever officially confirmed what “Jupiter” really is or if it really is the father of “Apollo“. I noticed a blog post of a Microsoft Developer Evangelist mentioning XAML being Jupiter, but it might still just be a mistake, since developer evangelists are not usually members of the product engineering teams at Microsoft, so it might still just be based on rumors taken as fact. Looking for any confirmation I found there was not even a Wikipedia article for the latest XAML UI framework so here it is:

Tagged , , , ,